“I don’t believe it was the Shroud, but I believe it is highly probable that there was a body in there – it was the time of the Crusades and an appropriate way to humiliate a Christian would be to crucify him. A Catholic Scientist Champions the Shroud of Turin By Gerard Verschuuren, Sophia Institute Press, 2021, 240 pages. “Whereas in reality, you have to put the nails through the wrist, I think a complete replication of the image has not been achieved. “There’s no real evidence it was painted on there, and the other oddity is if you look at paintings from the Middle Ages they always paint Christ with the nails going through the palms of the hands. But as Freeman himself admits, the Sudarium was 'in Spain in 1030,' that is, 230 years before 1260 which is the. These results therefore provide conclusive evidence that the linen of the Shroud of Turin is medieval. Yet for this to have been the work of a forger, he would have had to have access to the Shroud of Turin. The results of radiocarbon measurements at Arizona, Oxford and Zurich yield a calibrated age range with at least 95 confidence for the linen of the Shroud of Turin of AD 1260-1390 (rounded down / up to the nearest 10 yr.). “A number of people have made their whole career out of the Shroud, in one way or another. The fit between the bloodstains on the Sudarium and the Shroud is too close and complex to have been mere coincidence. Cloning the man on the Shroud of Turin: The Media’s Hyperbole with the Double Helix by Kelly P. He continued: “There are certain groups who resisted and continue to resist the date.
“Others believe the sample came not from the original cloth, but from a much later repair.”īut, Professor Tite admitted there was one “oddity” he discovered during the testing, leading him to believe there was a body inside the Shroud at one point, a breakthrough in understanding the struggle of Bible followers in the Middle Ages.
0 kommentar(er)
